![]() |
|
home methodology © University of Newcastle upon Tyne |
|
Methodology
BackgroundJoel Migdal has explored how a state trying to implement a rule unavoidably needs to strike compromises with a wealth of local actors who are also involved in establishing social control. This is especially true in the case of water because it is a vital resource that is accessible at a multitude of points over a territory. Exploring the interface between the customary and informal institutions that spell out the rules of water management and the formal institutions also trying to achieve the same aims requires field intensive methodologies. Within this research, we have used several methods of qualitative research: participant observation, semi-structured interviews and documentary research figured prominently here. The ProcessThe field researchers use grounded theory to guide their work. This requires them to go back and forth between a theory and data because the questions they ask arise from the data they collect.
Interviews need to be supplemented by observations because the rules in use need to be identified. These often do not appear
anywhere in writing. They cannot be observed directly either. Only the activities that are actually carried out according to the rules
in use can be observed. The field researchers therefore proceed to extensive observations of activities surrounding water and these
observations allow them to reconstruct the working rules or rules in use. The concept of rules in use
was pioneered by Elinor Ostrom. OutputsWe have a summary of the Zambia fieldwork, and an outline of the legal framework
as PDF Dr Zoe Wilson, head of the team at Kwazulu University has also contributed the following presentations in furtherance of the project:
Paxina Chileshe at Newcastle University has contributed the following Paper presented at the Water Governance seminar series at the University of Bradford, February 2006: |
|
updated jan 07 |